Why Buy-Sell Planning Can’t Wait
By David Weinstock
Most business owners understand and appreciate the need for a properly drafted buy–sell agreement, but too many operate without one – the demands of day-to-day operations relegate such planning to the back burner. One thing I have heard too many times from business partners/co-owners is “when I die, my partner will do the right thing.” Maybe so, but death significantly changes the relationship balance and there is typically a lot of money at stake… a time when people get “funny.”
Consider the following scenario: Joe Client’s business partner died with a 1/3 ownership interest in a closely held business. The business was worth about $5,000,000. It was a good partnership and the three owners were friendly outside of work. They planned to implement a buy-sell agreement that would cover the death of a partner, but never completed the process. The business did, however, purchase life insurance for each partner in anticipation of the agreement. The end result was a long legal battle that worked out fine for the attorneys. The other parties to the process were less pleased. The deceased partner’s spouse trusted the remaining owners but none of them had formally agreed what the ultimate value should be. It was only prudent for that spouse to consult advisors. The attorney advised that the value of the business needed to be determined and, in addition, the insurance was not structured in a way that left any indication it was intended to fund the buyout. The remaining partners would not leave ownership with an unwanted party, so ultimately there was a settlement. In addition to the $1,500,000 of insurance proceeds the spouse already received, the business partners paid $1,000,000 in cash to buy back the interest of their deceased partner that they thought was pre-funded with insurance.
Buyout provisions are best worked out when everyone gets along. That’s the time when parties are in appropriate bargaining positions and a plan can be devised amicably. Often, a closely held business is an individual’s single largest asset and the uncertainty created without an agreement can only bring trouble.
After all, the key objective of a well-drafted buy-sell agreement is to create a definite and ready market for a closely held business interest that might otherwise be very difficult to sell. It limits the owners’ ability to transfer ownership to unwanted persons, usually by giving remaining owners or the business entity the “right of first refusal” at a predetermined price. Events such as death, disability, and retirement are typical triggers that would contractually obligate either the remaining owners or the business to make the purchase. This ensures that the parting owner will be able to liquidate interests.
Buy-sell agreements typically come in two flavors - entity purchase and cross purchase. An entity purchase agreement binds the business to purchase interests from a departing owner, while a cross purchase binds remaining owners individually. Each has its advantages and disadvantages. The type of business entity (S-Corp, C-Corp, Partnership, etc.) and the number of owners are key considerations to determining which is best.
If owners individually buy interests from the departing owner, their tax cost increases as it would with the purchase of other assets. Generally, when a business is the purchaser, the tax cost of the remaining owners doesn’t change. This however can be overcome depending on the type of entity and other considerations. There is no difference to the departing owner which type of agreement is in place, but the remaining owners could benefit greatly from an increase in tax cost if the business is later sold, reducing their taxable gain.
The more owners there are, the more cumbersome a cross purchase agreement becomes. Often agreements are funded for triggering events such as death or disability by purchasing insurance. Once the options are considered, insurance is typically the most cost effective way to assure liquidity is available when needed. A cross purchase would require each owner to purchase insurance on all other owners. A business with six owners would require 30 policies.
A combination of a cross purchase and entity purchase agreement brings flexibility to whether the individuals or the business will affect the buyout. One party is ultimately bound by the agreement to make the purchase. These agreements need to be drafted carefully. If the language of the document binds the individuals, and the entity ultimately makes the purchase, the owners will likely be treated as being relieved of an obligation for tax purposes. This could result in dividend treatment to the owners equal to the amount of the buyout, and commensurate ordinary income tax liabilities that otherwise would have been avoided.
Business relationships are dynamic and sometimes sour unexpectedly. When one owner wants to leave or oust another owner, there is typically less agreement on what the terms and price should be. Buy-sell provisions often lack guidance for disharmony among owners.
An interesting provision often referred to as a push-pull or Russian roulette dictates that if an owner makes an offer to buy, the potential seller is left with the decision to accept or become the buyer at the same price and conditions in the original offer. This assures an offer will be well thought out and fair, because the instigator does not know if he/she will ultimately be the buyer or seller.
For many business owners, a relatively substantial business value creates or otherwise adds to a taxable estate at death. When an owner dies, the business must be valued for form 706, the federal estate tax return. This value is often challenged by the IRS because of its subjectivity. The business is worth what a willing buyer will pay a willing seller, neither being under compulsion to buy or sell and both having knowledge of relevant facts. Although the rules are somewhat complex, a properly drafted buy-sell agreement can therefore fix the value of the business for estate tax purposes.
There are several tests to determine whether the agreement is “bona-fide.” These are more stringent when dealing with family members, but an agreement among non-related parties (or non-lineal descendants) typically is considered to be at arm’s length and would meet the tests. Many business owners have some flexibility in setting the value for the agreement because the value is subjective and they can agree “at arm’s length” so long as it is reasonable.
There is an important consideration here. Many choose to value the business at the higher end of reasonable to provide greater benefit to heirs and then fund the obligations with insurance. If the value is then fixed for estate tax purposes, this will increase the family tax burden.
Perhaps the owners should agree on a lower value, insure it, and agree to buy additional insurance (perhaps with company funds) so that the family will realize the higher amount at death.
For example, two partners may decide the value of a business should be $30,000,000 ($15,000,000 each), the amount they would like to see their families receive at death. There is no absolute value. Even a qualified business appraisal would consider a range of values. After consultation with advisers they agree to implement an agreement that fixes the value at $20,000,000 - also considered reasonable. They insure it with $10,000,000 of life insurance on each of their lives and place an additional $5,000,000 of insurance each in an irrevocable life insurance trust. The business also funds these premiums through bonuses or perhaps a more creative split-dollar arrangement. If properly executed, the end result will be that each family will receive $15,000,000 as they would if the agreement placed such value on the business, but only $10,000,000 should be included in the taxable estate. This potentially saves the family tax on $5,000,000 – approximately $2,500,000 in tax savings considering both federal and state estate taxes.
well-drafted buy-sell agreement is an absolute necessity for business owners, particularly when the intention is not to pass a business to the next generation. It can help avoid potentially disastrous, litigious, and expensive disputes and also create dramatic tax savings. Your heirs will appreciate the time you took to decide and plan for the value of the business for both succession and tax purposes, rather than leaving it for the IRS to decide. And if you are on the surviving end of a transition, you may avoid some serious headaches yourself!
By David Weinstock, Principal, WeiserMazars Wealth Advisors
David Weinstock is a Principal of WeiserMazars Wealth Advisors. He is responsible for legacy wealth planning involving estate, insurance and investment planning. He works directly with clients to develop and implement plans relating to their personal and/or business financial needs. He holds CFP, CPA, AEP (Accredited Estate Planner) and LUTC designations.
Some products may not be suitable for all investors. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact your tax advisor or David Weinstock at 212.375.6612 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Investment Advisory Services offered through WeiserMazars Wealth Advisors LLC, an SEC registered investment adviser located in New York, New York - 135 West 50th Street, 14th Floor, New York, NY 10020 – 212.375.6506 * Securities offered through Comprehensive Asset Management & Servicing, Inc., Member FINRA/SIPC, 2001 Route 46, Suite 506, Parsippany, NJ 07054. WeiserMazars Wealth Advisors LLC is a separate entity from Comprehensive Asset Management & Servicing, Inc.
IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: Any Federal tax advice contained herein is not written to be used for, and the recipient and any subsequent reader cannot use such advice for, the purpose of avoiding any penalties asserted under the Internal Revenue Code. If the foregoing contains Federal tax advice and is distributed to a person other than the addressee, each additional and subsequent reader hereof is notified that such advice should be considered to have been written to support the promotion or marketing of the transaction or matter addressed herein. In that event, each such reader should seek advice from an independent tax advisor with respect to the transaction or matter addressed herein based on the reader’s particular circumstances.
By Stephen Saluccio
By James Blake, David Rim and Noreen Taylor
By Jeremy Rice
By Robert Cummings, Sheila Grice and Nicole Modzelewski
By Louis Osmont and Kevin Pianko
By Stuart Nussbaum and Michael Pinna
By Nicole DiGiorgio
By Louis Osmont and Jules Reich
By Michael Coletti